Schools: Why This Should Be The Education Election

I was very pleased to see Mayor Mandel announce his platform plank calling for a coordinated strategy to keep communities vibrant and viable and, in turn, keep schools open. In my mind schools are the heart of community.

I’ve been trying to do my part on the municipal side of things, working to make infill development and density work for families in these same neighbourhoods:

In knocking on doors throughout Ward 10 these past months I’ve heard real apprehension from the residents of communities just now going through the sector review process. They have last spring’s school closures fresh in mind, and genuine worry with the new suburban schools opening up for students who had been busing in and propping up the enrolment numbers in older neighbourhood schools.

I’ve been monitoring the Edmonton Public School Board sector review process closely and attended their drop-in event last week at McNally school to review the material and provide my own feedback as a parent with a child a few years away from public school.

The framing of the background material and the worksheet and questions makes clear that the Board’s goal is building great schools to serve students, which makes sense on the surface. The exercise has a zero-sum premise, where there are no additional resources available: funding is set by the province ever since school boards lost control over the education property tax. The most common feedback I heard from other parents at the meeting, and on the doorstep, is that more funding is needed so that boards are not as cash strapped – a rejection of the zero-sum premise.

But it struck me after reviewing the material that I’m ok with more good schools rather than fewer great schools. The reason is simple: good schools as the heart of the neighbourhood add so much to the neighbourhood beyond the education of neighbourhood students. The opportunity for community use of school space is very important, and we have work to do to ensure that more of that space is available, not less, whether it’s for sports, day-care or adult education.

Encouragingly, this lines up with a key principle in the recommendations from Minister Hancock’s Inspiring Education project: “Community resources should be fully engaged to support learners, including expertise, facilities, services and learning opportunities. Community resources—whether local, provincial, national or global—should actively participate in the education of learners.” (see page 31 of the Steering Committee Report.

There was a positive meeting between the Board, Council and the Minister of Education this past spring. Unfourtunately I couldn’t attend but it was preliminary. The main thing that came out of the meeting was a commitment to meet again after the election to discuss solutions to keeping more schools viable. One of the possible next steps is a joint task force to delve further. I would be among the first to volunteer.

We need these schools to make living centrally more attractive to families, and we need more families to make these schools viable. So we’re going to need some creativity and collaboration to find a solution. If this whole election for council and the trustees could be about one thing, schools should be it.

Some interesting resources that have stimulated my thinking on this issue:

If you didn’t get a chance to attend the last consultation, there is another for the South Central Sector:

Tuesday, October 5, 2010, 4:00 – 9:00pm

Vimy Ridge Academy, Gym, 8205 – 90 Avenue

7 thoughts on “Schools: Why This Should Be The Education Election

  1. Hi Don,
    Thanks for the thoughtful comments above and for encouraging everyone to pay attention to education in this election. You mentioned dropping into the Sector Review meeting for South Central last week, and it was good to see you there.

    I think the Sector Review process allows everyone to consider many of the points you raise above, and I have just posted an encouragement to everyone to get involved on my own website (www.catherineripley.ca)

    People sometimes say there is a preordained plan and it is not worth their time to give their input. Trust me, there is no plan. The plan will emerge out of the consultation findings and that is why it is so important for everyone to get involved. I agree, too, that creativity and collaboration are critical to moving forward in providing the very best education we can for the future generation of councillors, doctors, salespeople, farmers, accountants, welders, dental hygenists, teachers…. etc. and of course, trustees! Cheers! Catherine

  2. Hi again, Don.

    I see that the Public School Boards Association posted a response to Mr. Mandel’s announcement, too, and some of your readers may wish to take a look at it. — http://schoolactblog.public-schools.ab.ca/archives/342. It discusses the difficultites created by level of funding (which you mention above) — “Currently, public school jurisdictions, on a day-to-day basis, may deal with the mandate of some or all of 13 different provincial government departments. There is no base funding and no reliable way of funding additional services, even though it might often be more comprehensive, ethical, and effective to do so. ” It also expresses the desire of member boards in the Public School Boards Association (of which Edmonton Public is one) to see more autonomy and flexibliity for school boards reflected in the new Education Act (which is expected to come to the Leg in the Spring session 2011)…

    And this makes me think about the Inspiring Action consultation that will feed into the final shaping of the proposed Education Act. These surveys are online until about the end of October, I believe, and with reference to this topic of “schools and community” I encourage people to take the time to fill out the one on “Shared Governance, Collaboration, School Boards, and Natural Person Powers”

    http://engage.education.alberta.ca/inspiring-action/become-involved/

Comments are closed.